SRFI 226 will eventually be finalized based on the input here. If
Committee F decides so, it will be integrated into the Foundations
where it may then be amended. A library with futures compatible with
SRFI 226 is probably something that should be specified as a SRFI and
then discussed as part of the batteries.

Am Sa., 26. März 2022 um 05:28 Uhr schrieb Nala Ginrut <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:29 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I think SRFI-18 provides the most useful features, if any possible, we can make some advanced features based on it.
>>
>> Thank you for your input and independent valuation.
>>
>>
>
> How can we move forward about this topic (thread/future), do we have a standard process to proceed with the conclusion of the discussion so far?
> And people may take part in the further API definition work.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to xxxxxx@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scheme-reports-wg2/CAPjoZodN3aY6PZMr5xiUwGeZrEBQ6Asrbvn6otMOUksKdFSejw%40mail.gmail.com.