Thank you!

Am Di., 15. Nov. 2022 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
> It says "Returns ... constructed by continuation-mark-set->list when applied to the same arguments", but continuation-mark-set->iterator takes key-list, while continuation-mark-set->list takes a single key.  Reference implementation suggests it is intended to be continuation-mark-set->list*.

Indeed; the * is missing in the text.

>
> If that's the case, "A correct but possibly inefficient implementation" shown in the entry needs to be adjusted as well.

Fixed (in personal repo).