Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Daphne Preston-Kendal (08 Jan 2025 09:59 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Daphne Preston-Kendal (08 Jan 2025 10:38 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Daphne Preston-Kendal (08 Jan 2025 10:43 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Arthur A. Gleckler (08 Jan 2025 16:01 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (08 Jan 2025 16:42 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Jan 2025 01:18 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Jan 2025 17:31 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Jan 2025 09:44 UTC)
Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Jan 2025 20:24 UTC)

Re: Sample implementation no longer appears to work on Chez 10 Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 13 Jan 2025 09:43 UTC

I am going to make a PR myself for the main document. Using a custom
evaluator, as in Daphne's proposal, has the issue that some global
state (like the state of threads) is initialised anew for each
evaluation. Of course, it is possible to write a REPL that acts within
the dynamic extent of the `run' procedure but this is out of the scope
of SRFI 226. That said, I am fine with others adding code to this SRFI
in a `contrib/' subdirectory.

Marc

PS Thanks, Shiro, for proposing a wording!

Am So., 12. Jan. 2025 um 18:31 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 1:32 AM Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I made a PR.  Marc, is my wording appropriate?
>>
>> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-226/pull/9
>
>
> Marc, what do you think?  Note that Shiro's pull request applies to the source code of the sample implementation, not to the document.