Am Sa., 22. Apr. 2023 um 05:00 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:
>
> The problem with SRFI 97 is that you need either just a number (which is standard in R7RS) or a number plus a mnemonic but not predictable name, but if the SRFI exports multiple libraries, you have to call them (srfi <number> <srfi-name> <library-hame>); you can't omit the supposedly optional <srfi-name>.

I don't see a problem here as long as the mnemonic name is part of the
SRFI's API.  This is what SRFI 97 already demands from post-SRFI 97
SRFIs.