(1) I'm still unhappy with the name "product comparator" as it is none
(the spec should really add the (make-product-comparator
real-comparator real-comparator) example.

Understanding of concepts becomes needlessly more complicated when the
terms are only quite right.

I haven't spoken up again yet because I haven't had a flash of wit
concerning a good name.

make-intersection-comparator/make-union-comparator would be good names
from a theoretical perspective, at least the latter one would probably
make no problems.

Alternative names:

make-product-comparator -> make-layered-comparator or
make-combined-comparator or make-every-comparator or
make-for-all-comparator
make-wrapper-comparator -> make-induced-comparator or make-quotient-comparator

Am Mo., 5. Dez. 2022 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal
<xxxxxx@nonceword.org>:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Does anyone have any further last call comments before SRFI 228 goes final?
>
> The changes suggested by Shiro, with the base cases defined by Jakob, were incorporated last week.
> Nobody has suggested any better names than product and sum comparator.
>
> If there are no further comments, I will ask Arthur to make the SRFI final.
>
>
> Daphne
>