SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Jens Axel Søgaard (13 Jan 2022 15:53 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Bradley Lucier (13 Jan 2022 19:30 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Jens Axel Søgaard (13 Jan 2022 21:46 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Bradley Lucier (16 Jan 2022 22:11 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats John Cowan (17 Jan 2022 18:50 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Bradley Lucier (18 Jan 2022 16:52 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats John Cowan (19 Jan 2022 23:25 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Lucier, Bradley J (19 Jan 2022 23:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Bradley Lucier (20 Jan 2022 15:54 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Jens Axel Søgaard (20 Jan 2022 16:19 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Bradley Lucier (20 Jan 2022 17:57 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Jens Axel Søgaard (20 Jan 2022 19:08 UTC)

Re: SRFI 231 - Easy conversion for common array formats Bradley Lucier 20 Jan 2022 15:54 UTC

On 1/19/22 6:25 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> That works for vectors, but not lists, because '(foo) is the perfectly
> good list (quote (foo)).  It smacks of guessing, and I dislike guessing
> in Scheme code.

And, in fact, it appears that the notation does not allow for nested lists.

I mention Racket's math/array in these emails only to say what another
important array package does that might offer good ideas.  I'm not an
expert.

Brad