Re: Make code safe for continuation capture, part the first. · gambiteer/srfi-231@2876863
Bradley Lucier 03 Aug 2022 20:57 UTC
On 8/3/22 4:28 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> I am going to write PFNs for the following SRFIs warning that the use of
> multiple returns produces unspecified results: 133 (general vectors),
> 160 (homogeneous non-bit vector), 178 (bit vectors), 196 (ranges), and
> 214 (flexvectors). If anyone wants to write space-eating SRFIs that
> are call/cc-safe, by all means do so.
What's a PFN?
