Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Aug 2022 19:58 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (18 Aug 2022 14:57 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Sep 2022 07:32 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Sep 2022 17:59 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Sep 2022 18:25 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (12 Sep 2022 17:33 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (14 Sep 2022 06:48 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (17 Sep 2022 15:51 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Bradley Lucier (20 Sep 2022 00:43 UTC)
Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (20 Sep 2022 06:33 UTC)

Re: Video on continuations, and call/cc-safe programming in the SRFI Bradley Lucier 20 Sep 2022 00:43 UTC

On 9/14/22 2:48 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> - It says that the sample implementation implements the procedures
> without a "!" in a "call/cc-safe" way.  But that should be part of the
> specification, i.e. that every conforming implementation must implement
> the procedures without a "!" in a "call/cc-safe" way.

I can't find it in me to require implementors to do something that I
cannot define precisely.

Brad