|
mutation naming conventions
Alex Shinn
(24 May 2023 02:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 May 2023 05:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Alex Shinn
(24 May 2023 08:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 May 2023 08:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Alex Shinn
(24 May 2023 10:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 May 2023 16:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Shawn Wagner
(31 May 2023 01:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(25 May 2023 17:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Bradley Lucier
(26 May 2023 17:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Alex Shinn
(27 May 2023 08:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
John Cowan
(28 May 2023 22:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Alex Shinn
(29 May 2023 00:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
John Cowan
(29 May 2023 01:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Alex Shinn
(29 May 2023 09:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions Vladimir Nikishkin (29 May 2023 15:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: mutation naming conventions
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 May 2023 14:52 UTC)
|
I cannot contribute to the discussion meaningfully, but I think that (operation!! mutee) could be a decent naming convention. A single ! can be seen as (you will be confused!) , whereas two !! can be seen as (you will be confused! and not where you expect to be!) On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 17:35, Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:26 AM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 8:45 PM Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This seems to be WAI. >> >> >> I don't know what "WAI" is. > > > Working as Intended. > > -- > Alex > -- Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin (Sent from GMail web interface.)
