Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any

Show/hide message thread

Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (08 Nov 2025 21:32 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (10 Nov 2025 23:22 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Alex Shinn (25 Nov 2025 09:32 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (01 Dec 2025 16:25 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Alex Shinn (03 Dec 2025 00:01 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (04 Dec 2025 22:21 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (06 Dec 2025 02:43 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (06 Dec 2025 03:11 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (06 Dec 2025 16:13 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier (06 Dec 2025 23:47 UTC)

Re: Proposal to reduce the number of argument to array-for-each, array-every, and array-any Bradley Lucier 06 Dec 2025 03:11 UTC

On 12/5/25 21:43, Bradley Lucier wrote:
> Here are some times:

I forgot to say that the arrays are 1000 x 1000 f64 arrays:

 > (define domain (make-interval '#(1000 1000)))
 > (define a (make-specialized-array domain f64-storage-class 1.))
 > (define b (make-specialized-array domain f64-storage-class 2.))