SRFI 233: INI files Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Aug 2022 19:20 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Vladimir Nikishkin (11 Aug 2022 04:36 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Vladimir Nikishkin (11 Aug 2022 04:46 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Aug 2022 06:08 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (11 Aug 2022 14:18 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Lassi Kortela (11 Aug 2022 07:53 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Vladimir Nikishkin (11 Aug 2022 08:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Lassi Kortela (11 Aug 2022 08:50 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files John Cowan (11 Aug 2022 14:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files Hugo Hörnquist (12 Aug 2022 09:50 UTC)
Re: SRFI 233: INI files John Cowan (12 Aug 2022 23:33 UTC)

Re: SRFI 233: INI files Lassi Kortela 11 Aug 2022 07:53 UTC

> Another noble goal might have been to "do an extensive research and to
> create an exhaustive model for INI files for everyone's reference".
> But this srfi does not seem to have such a goal?

Exactly. An INI SRFI that doesn't require the user to specify which
flavor of INI to use will standardize subtly broken code.

Surveying the extant flavors is tedious, but it's the right thing to do.
And would help communities beyond Scheme.

Here's a typical manifestation of the problem:
https://github.com/editorconfig/editorconfig/issues/97