Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide (11 Apr 2023 06:42 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Apr 2023 15:36 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Apr 2023 17:05 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Apr 2023 18:30 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Apr 2023 18:32 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Apr 2023 19:05 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (13 Apr 2023 19:16 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Apr 2023 19:33 UTC)
Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Apr 2023 18:59 UTC)

Re: Steps to finish SRFI 234: topological sorting Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 13 Apr 2023 19:16 UTC

Am Do., 13. Apr. 2023 um 21:05 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:32 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> PS I am advocating the Unix philosophy a bit here.  Every fundamental
>> procedure just needs to be able to do a single thing because we can
>> compose procedures.
>
>
> Ha!  That Eric Raymond has convinced people that "do one thing well" is the Unix philosophy is a masterstroke of marketing.  When I look at the man page of any widely used Unix tool, e.g. diff or find or ls or tar, I see the furthest thing from "do one thing well" that is possible.  But from the Scheme perspective, I understand what you mean.  (Sorry for the micro-rant.)

True!

Emacs may be the positive exception: it does one thing well -
emulating a whole OS. ;)