Number of return values of topological-sort
Shiro Kawai
(30 Jun 2024 07:50 UTC)
|
RE: Number of return values of topological-sort
Maxime Devos
(01 Jul 2024 09:06 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Jul 2024 12:15 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Lassi Kortela
(01 Jul 2024 12:31 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
(01 Jul 2024 16:28 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Jul 2024 01:39 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide (02 Jul 2024 05:36 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Aug 2024 13:50 UTC)
|
RE: Number of return values of topological-sort
Maxime Devos
(01 Jul 2024 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2024 16:14 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
(01 Jul 2024 19:33 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2024 20:23 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2024 20:26 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
(01 Jul 2024 22:35 UTC)
|
RE: Number of return values of topological-sort
Maxime Devos
(01 Jul 2024 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Shiro Kawai
(01 Jul 2024 20:31 UTC)
|
Re: Number of return values of topological-sort
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(01 Jul 2024 20:36 UTC)
|
RE: Number of return values of topological-sort
Maxime Devos
(01 Jul 2024 21:10 UTC)
|
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> writes: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 12:34 PM Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide (via srfi-234 list) <xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org> wrote: > > That sounds reasonable. I created a pull-request. > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-234/pull/10 > > I've merged and pushed this change. Shall I declare a new draft, and perhaps even a last-call period? Thank you! But no, not yet: there’s a problem with ChezScheme with this version (you always have to get all values, otherwise you get an error). ⇒ needs two different ways to call, and one of them only returns one value. In Guile I can do (define a (values 'a 'b 'c)) a and (import (srfi :11)) (let-values (((a b c) (values 'a 'b 'c))) a) This SRFI needs to accomodate all Schemes, so returning multiple values must be optional. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de