Unspecified result
Lassi Kortela
(07 Nov 2022 12:01 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (07 Nov 2022 13:01 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Lassi Kortela
(07 Nov 2022 13:18 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Nov 2022 13:31 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Lassi Kortela
(07 Nov 2022 13:47 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Nov 2022 13:56 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Lassi Kortela
(07 Nov 2022 14:14 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Nov 2022 14:20 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Lassi Kortela
(07 Nov 2022 14:45 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Nov 2022 14:50 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
John Cowan
(07 Nov 2022 14:45 UTC)
|
Re: Unspecified result
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Nov 2022 14:53 UTC)
|
Am Mo., 7. Nov. 2022 um 13:01 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>: > > "The result of the independently expression is unspecified." > > I foresee potential problems if the result is permitted to be one of the > subexpressions' results (chosen arbitrarily). Should the result always > be the same constant value? In what sense do you think that potential problems arise? An expression like "(set! <identifier> <expression>)" could, in principle, return the value, which is assigned to the identifier. From a theoretical point of view, the only convincing stricter semantics would be to return no values (as per "(values)").