I've just published draft #3 of SRFI 237. It was submitted by Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, author of the SRFI.

Here are Marc's comments on the draft:

The define-record-name definition has been added. It brings the syntactical layer on par with the procedural layer regarding more than one constructor per record type.

Here is the commit summary:

• Drop empty srfi-213.
• Fix: see-also links added to the wrong SRFI.
• Add "srfi-213/" back with a "README.org".
• Fix typo.
• Remove submodule.
• Add submodule.
• Fix first example.
• WIP: Secondary define-record-type definitions.
• Implement shadow define-record-type definitions.
• Introduce define-record-name.
• Change syntax of define-record-name so that defined name comes first.
• Add code for dictionary example.
• Add documentation for define-record-name.
• Remove old code artefacts.
• Record name as syntax.
• Fix link to personal repo.
• Fix second link as well.
• Publish third draft.

Here's the diff:

https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-237/compare/draft-2..draft-3

Regards,


SRFI Editor