Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Nov 2022 07:10 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Feeley (02 Nov 2022 10:18 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Daphne Preston-Kendal (02 Nov 2022 10:28 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Nov 2022 10:41 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Nov 2022 10:49 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Nov 2022 10:37 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Feeley (02 Nov 2022 12:28 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Nov 2022 12:50 UTC)
Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Nov 2022 12:55 UTC)

Re: Perpetuity of non-generative record type definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 02 Nov 2022 10:48 UTC

Am Mi., 2. Nov. 2022 um 11:41 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:

> Am Mi., 2. Nov. 2022 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal
> <xxxxxx@nonceword.org>:

> > [ ...] but I’ve given up arguing against the design decisions in the R6RS record library.

Then I hope you like the simplifications introduced by the latest two
drafts of this SRFI, which effectively replace the triad of record
name/record-type descriptor/record constructor descriptor with the
concept of a "record descriptor".  This addresses what's at the core
of the SRFI 99 criticism.