|
External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Nov 2022 16:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Shiro Kawai
(06 Nov 2022 21:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Nov 2022 21:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Lassi Kortela
(06 Nov 2022 21:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation José Bollo (08 Nov 2022 20:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(08 Nov 2022 20:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 Nov 2022 00:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 06:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(09 Nov 2022 07:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
John Cowan
(09 Nov 2022 15:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 15:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
John Cowan
(09 Nov 2022 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: External representation
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(07 Nov 2022 09:58 UTC)
|
Le Sun, 6 Nov 2022 23:29:36 +0200,
Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> a écrit :
> >> Ah, Gauche already uses #[...] for another purpose.
> >> Could it be an extension of srfi-10, e..g #,(<rtd> ....)? Oh,
> >> wait, that conflicts with R6RS. Hmm...
>
> > The problem is that any sensible lexical syntax will probably
> > conflict with some existing syntax of some implementations.
>
> Survey at https://registry.scheme.org/#hash-syntax
Strange the construct #{...} doesn't seem to be used
>
> Common Lisp uses #S(...) for structures, i.e. records --
> http://clhs.lisp.se/Body/02_dhm.htm