SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Nov 2022 22:10 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 02:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Nov 2022 02:22 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 03:03 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Nov 2022 03:38 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 03:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 04:03 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Nov 2022 04:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela (04 Nov 2022 07:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela (04 Nov 2022 07:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (04 Nov 2022 07:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela (04 Nov 2022 12:52 UTC)

Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela 04 Nov 2022 07:04 UTC

If there's a need, we can have separate machine-independent linux-errno,
openbsd-errno, cygwin-errno, etc. (as listed in
https://misc.lassi.io/2020/errno-conflicts.text) But I think the mapping
with the simplest name, "errno", should be for the current machine.
Otherwise the simplest use cases have to find out what OS is underneath
and do a case statement based on that. It all gets very complicated if
you just want to wrap some FFI code.