Typographical issue John Cowan (27 Jan 2023 04:26 UTC)
Re: Typographical issue Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (18 Mar 2023 14:03 UTC)

Re: Typographical issue Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 18 Mar 2023 14:03 UTC

Am Fr., 27. Jan. 2023 um 05:26 Uhr schrieb John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org>:
>
> It isn't very clear in the Examples section that `guard` is a syntactic keyword.  I read "[<pattern> (guard <guard expression> ... (body)>" as if "guard" was "<guard>".  The fact that in the printed version the angle brackets and parens look much alike didn't help either.  I suggest putting everything within angle brackets in roman type and the keywords in bold (both as in RnRS).

I incorporated the suggested typographic conventions.

(And it reinforced my doubts that HTML is a good choice for the
authoritative format for SRFIs...)