A solution to unifying SRFIs 245 and 251, or SRFI 251 with R6RS Daphne Preston-Kendal 15 Oct 2024 07:42 UTC

I believe I have found a solution to unifying the desirable aspects of the semantics of both SRFIs, in particular the R6RS-style syntax definition semantics proposed by 245 and the R7RS-style body form of 251.

<https://codeberg.org/scheme/r7rs/issues/104#issuecomment-2380647>

Daphne