(removing srfi-discuss from CC as this is now a discussion about matters specific to this SRFI)

On 7 Sep 2024, at 09:53, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

> As I wrote, I am willing to do this.

Your email arrived in my mailbox as I was still preparing mine :-)

> I would also include a section on ephemerons because I would like to define reachability in the presence of ephemerons as well.

Yes, I think this would be a good improvement. Please also note the request for a non-procedure-based API made by Marc Feeley in the mailing list for this SRFI.

Could you also consider adding your transport guardians/transport cells proposal to this SRFI, or perhaps making it a new SRFI?
<https://codeberg.org/scheme/r7rs/issues/96#issuecomment-640017>

Ideally all of these – ephemerons, guardians, and transport guardians – need to be considered for inclusion in the Valued Fascicle, which was originally scheduled for December this year but will probably end up being next year following the illness-induced schedule slip this year.

Daphne