Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 248: Minimal delimited continuations
Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen 29 Oct 2024 14:01 UTC
As I didn't test the code I posted, of course, I introduced a mistake:
[...]
> Note that when K^ is the empty continuation in the sense of SRFI 248,
> the code above builds unnecessary objects. A version without a space
> leak is thus:
>
> (app-second
> (guard
> (c k^
> (else
> (let ((k (if (empty-continuation? k^) k^ (lambda (x) (app-first (k^ x))))))
> (values
> (lambda () (k (raise-continuable c)))
> (lambda () H)))))
> (let ((v E))
> (values
> (lambda () v)
> (lambda () v)))))
Please replace the condition
(if (empty-continuation? k^) k^ (lambda (x) (app-first k^ x)))
with
(if (empty-condition? k^) values (lambda (x) (app-first (k^ x))))
PS I am going to add one more comment later.