Some thoughts... David Rush (21 Nov 2001 19:26 UTC)
Bad things Re: Some thoughts... Jussi Piitulainen (21 Nov 2001 20:25 UTC)
Re: Bad things Re: Some thoughts... David Rush (22 Nov 2001 16:10 UTC)
Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Jussi Piitulainen (27 Nov 2001 10:59 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Per Bothner (27 Nov 2001 17:10 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] David Rush (27 Nov 2001 17:25 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Per Bothner (27 Nov 2001 17:55 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] David Rush (27 Nov 2001 21:19 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Jussi Piitulainen (28 Nov 2001 15:40 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Jussi Piitulainen (28 Nov 2001 16:20 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Noel Welsh (28 Nov 2001 10:55 UTC)
Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Jussi Piitulainen (28 Nov 2001 17:21 UTC)

Re: Access time of elements Re: Bad things [] Jussi Piitulainen 28 Nov 2001 16:20 UTC

Per Bothner writes:

> The main problem with (2) is that it adds a new concept - an "index
> object" data-type.

I'd hate to specify three different kinds of indexed data types.

If we switched to index objects, could they be just vectors? They have
some hope of both being efficient and having tools already available.

As to efficiency, a general array as an index object would have a lot
of overhead, relative to its size. Otherwise it would be much better,
for using parts of arrays as indexes.
--
Jussi