The current SRFI text still contains the text:

"The hash-table-keys, hash-table-values, hash-table-entries (from SRFI
69) and the corresponding vector-based versions (used in R6RS) have
been removed from this SRFI in favour of the cursor-based iteration
interface."

PS Thanks for the new draft, but you are too much in a hurry for me.
:) I haven't even found time to respond to Daphne's replies to the
issues I raised about the previous draft a couple of days ago.

Am Mo., 13. Okt. 2025 um 22:51 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> I've just published draft #5 of SRFI 250. It was submitted by Daphne Preston-Kendal, co-author of the SRFI.
>
> Here are Daphne's comments on the draft:
>
>>
>> In response to Marc’s last call comments, I would like to have one last draft re-adding hash-table-keys/-values/-entries (as vectors) and changing the error condition for hash-table=.
>
> Here is the commit summary:
>
> Don’t require an assertion violation for `hash-table=`
> Restore `hash-table-keys`, `hash-table-values`, `hash-table-entries`
> Update acknowledgements
> Add `hash-table-keys`, `-values`, `-entries` to sample impl
> Don’t enforce an error for non-eqv? same?-functions in the impl
> Publish fifth draft.
>
> Here's the diff:
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-250/compare/draft-4..draft-5
>
> Since this new draft comes at the end of a last-call period, I'm extending the period.  If you're interested in this SRFI, please give your feedback via the SRFI 250 mailing list before 2025-10-22. After that, assuming that no major revisions are required, we will declare it final. It is important that we get your feedback before 2025-10-22. If that deadline is too soon for you, but you would like to contribute, please let me know so that I can extend the last-call period.
>
> Regards,
>
> SRFI Editor