Re: 251 vs. 245 Per Bothner 02 Dec 2023 06:11 UTC

There are multiple Scheme implementations that implement SRFI-245 semantics.
Are there any that implement SRFI-251 semantics? Or planning to?
Is there any user demand for SRFI-251 semantics as opposed to SRFI-245 semantics?
Are there any benefits to SRFI-251 semantics over SRFI-246?
Does SRFI-251 allow recursive procedure definitions in a body? (SRFI-245 does.)
Is SRFI-251 is more true to "the Scheme nature"?

As I see it, the answer to all of these questions is "no".
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/