Re: Test procedures vs macros
Antero Mejr 03 Apr 2024 02:00 UTC
> On 04/03/2024 8:22 AM CST Shiro Kawai <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> test-property etc. are listed as procedures. How about making them
> macros? Then the implementation can use given forms as a part of the
> message, and/or extract implementation-specific info such as source info?
Sure that sounds useful. I will add it to the current revision.