On 2024-10-26 18:29 +0200, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> The "restartable" form is to enable users to replace procedure
> arguments in case of inadequate arguments delivered to a procedure.
> The condition type for the latter exception is the assertion
> violation.  Thus, it is out of the scope of the original idea of the
> "restartable" form to consider other condition types.

After thinking about this a bit, I agree. I like how straightforward
‘restartable’ is.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>