On 14 Nov 2024, at 22:28, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:52 PM Daphne Preston-Kendal <xxxxxx@nonceword.org> wrote:
>>   The only comment I have is to echo one sent to me when I solicited some outside opinions on this SRFI: the design has changed so much from Common Lisp and MIT Scheme that we need significant experience testing the new design. I consider that we need this experience before we can consider accepting it in this form into R7RS Large, especially into the Foundations.
>
> That makes sense.  Just to be clear, though, that doesn't preclude it being finalized as a SRFI.  In fact, finalizing it will give implementers something concrete to try and to give feedback on.

Indeed, it certainly wasn’t my intention to object to SRFI finalization.

Daphne