Re: Comments on define-restartable (was Re: New draft (#8) and last call for comments on SRFI 255: Restarting conditions)
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 14 Dec 2024 22:48 UTC
On 2024-12-14 13:57 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> I don't disagree. But if the choice is between a non-TR implementation and
> no implementation, I favor the first.
Thanks. I may simply add a note that the last expression in a
‘define-restartable’ body may not be in tail position—assuming Marc or
I don’t find a better solution.
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>