On 2024-12-15 17:50 -0500, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> > The problem is what I perceive as a flaw of the current system; as
> > long as there are restarters available, the condition must be hidden
> > from other handlers. A pending restart *is* a handled condition,
> > semantically.

After a little more thought, I wanted to reiterate the problem I see
with these semantics. We can remove the original condition except when
it satisfies ‘restarter?’. In that case, all of its simple restarter
conditions must be extracted and re-composed with the new restarters.

This seems like an awkward special case.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>