One thing I've wanted that the proposal doesn't cover is the ability to
       reorder the arguments.

I like the idea but:

	(curry - <2> <1>)           ==  (lambda (x1 x2) (- x2 x1))

"<1>" is not a number but plays the role of one.  The indirection
seems needlessly unparsimonious, hence, unschemelike.  Suppose, for
example, that while processing code that uses this macro I want to
sort a list of "<1>...<20>".

Perhaps a different syntax?

-t