>
>You're wrong.  Quoting R5RS:
>
>More formally, an input form F matches a pattern P if and only if:
>
>[...]
>

Yep. I see it now.

Regardless of that I would propose to change
the syntax to something like

(curry <procedure> (<constant-or-slot>* [. <>]))

or

(curry (<constant-or-slot>* [. <>]) <procedure>)

That resembles a lambda-list more closely, IMHO.

felix