Group Email Manager

login signup
Re: is that useful? sebastian.egner@xxxxxx (22 Feb 2002 16:15 UTC)
Re: is that useful? Walter C. Pelissero (25 Feb 2002 12:02 UTC)
Re: is that useful? sperber@xxxxxx (25 Feb 2002 14:33 UTC)
Re: is that useful? Walter C. Pelissero (26 Feb 2002 14:40 UTC)
Re: is that useful? sperber@xxxxxx (26 Feb 2002 14:53 UTC)
Re: is that useful? Dave Mason (26 Feb 2002 15:28 UTC)
Re: is that useful? sperber@xxxxxx (26 Feb 2002 15:39 UTC)
Re: is that useful? Dave Mason (26 Feb 2002 16:45 UTC)
Re: is that useful? Walter C. Pelissero (26 Feb 2002 16:37 UTC)
Re: is that useful? sperber@xxxxxx (26 Feb 2002 16:41 UTC)
Re: is that useful? sperber@xxxxxx 26 Feb 2002 16:41 UTC 
>>>>> "WP" == Walter C Pelissero <xxxxxx@pelissero.org> writes:

WP> The reason why you can't see the point for a more complete solution
WP> than this SRFI is that you limited your view to map and for-each.

No, I haven't.  I've only examined those to get at the numbers.  I was
too lazy to do a more complete analysis.  Let me repeat again: I
*remember* often wishing for something like SRFI 26 while writing
code.  I don't remember *ever* wishing for something more general.

--
Cheers =8-} M.
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla