Re: New revision of SRFI 26 available sebastian.egner@xxxxxx (05 Jun 2002 11:13 UTC)
Re: New revision of SRFI 26 available Al Petrofsky (05 Jun 2002 15:22 UTC)

Re: New revision of SRFI 26 available Al Petrofsky 05 Jun 2002 15:21 UTC

I'm glad you're dropping the "constant" terminology.

Feel free to use and modify my code.  Two issues with it: the <> and
<...> in the "exported" functions are superfluous, and the use of
(begin proc) should have a comment to the effect "ensures
non-expression in operator position is an error, e.g. (cut quote <>)".

-al