Thank you very much for writing the SRFI, Zheng.

What about copying the still relevant parts of SRFI 97 and updating
the list of assigned library names to all the new SRFIs up to SRFI
260?

Then, SRFI 261 can supersede SRFI 97 completely.

Marc

Am Do., 8. Mai 2025 um 04:33 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> Scheme Request for Implementation 261,
> "Portable SRFI Library Reference",
> by WANG Zheng,
> is now available for discussion.
>
> Its draft and an archive of the ongoing discussion are available at https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-261/.
>
> You can join the discussion of the draft by filling out the subscription form on that page.
>
> You can contribute a message to the discussion by sending it to xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org.
>
> Here's the abstract:
>
> This SRFI proposal addresses systemic compatibility issues exposed by the library reference format defined in SRFI 97 (srfi :<SRFI number> <identifier> ...) and advocates for a modernized, portable alternative: (srfi srfi-<SRFI number> <identifier> ...).
>
> Regards,
>
> SRFI Editor