This seems OK to me. I'll update this draft next week or the week after
next week, with digesting newly comments.

在 2025/5/8 23:13, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 写道:
> Thank you very much for writing the SRFI, Zheng.
>
> What about copying the still relevant parts of SRFI 97 and updating
> the list of assigned library names to all the new SRFIs up to SRFI
> 260?
>
> Then, SRFI 261 can supersede SRFI 97 completely.
>
> Marc
>
> Am Do., 8. Mai 2025 um 04:33 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
> <xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>> Scheme Request for Implementation 261,
>> "Portable SRFI Library Reference",
>> by WANG Zheng,
>> is now available for discussion.
>>
>> Its draft and an archive of the ongoing discussion are available at https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-261/.
>>
>> You can join the discussion of the draft by filling out the subscription form on that page.
>>
>> You can contribute a message to the discussion by sending it to xxxxxx@srfi.schemers.org.
>>
>> Here's the abstract:
>>
>> This SRFI proposal addresses systemic compatibility issues exposed by the library reference format defined in SRFI 97 (srfi :<SRFI number> <identifier> ...) and advocates for a modernized, portable alternative: (srfi srfi-<SRFI number> <identifier> ...).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> SRFI Editor