I would like to reiterate my request to re-evaluate the exclusion criteria.

There should be library names for every SRFI which exports identifiers.

The current criteria is absurd inasmuch as it seems to explicitly ‘exclude’ libraries which actually already have library names assigned by authors (e.g. my SRFI 207) and successors to SRFIs for which this is the case (SRFI 160, succeeds SRFI 4 which has a library name – doubly absurd as SRFI 160 explicitly defines its lexical syntax as optional).

Daphne