Re: SRFI-defined library names
Daphne Preston-Kendal 08 Oct 2025 07:31 UTC
On 8 Oct 2025, at 06:33, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> wrote:
> * Some names, like "mixing-definitions-and-expressions", are
> needlessly long. Finding short names is notoriously tough, but
> standardizing a long, ugly name for the sake of standardizing
> *some* name is a bad idea.
This SRFI in fact does not need a name as it exports no identifiers; it rather changes core language semantics. Once again, the SRFI fails even to consistently apply its own principles about which SRFIs are eligible for names.
Daphne