Re: SRFI-defined library names
Peter McGoron 08 Oct 2025 17:55 UTC
On 10/8/25 00:33, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> Another problem related to Daphne's points is more subtle: Not all
> SRFIs state that everything in them should be provided by a single
> library.
SRFI-97 has explicit wording on sublibraries that fixes this problem.
This SRFI should include it, I didn't even realize it didn't.
-- Peter McGoron