Re: Final SRFI 261: Portable SRFI Library Reference
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 30 Jan 2026 12:37 UTC
Am Fr., 30. Jan. 2026 um 13:26 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal
<xxxxxx@nonceword.org>:
>
> There is no problem with multiple SRFIs having the same name. Vide the several SRFIs called ‘records’ (9, 57, 99, 131 – according to the SRFI metadata, that is)
Why multiple SRFIs may have non-unique library name (parts), in this
particular case the name "unifiable-boxes" is much better than "boxes"
for for SRFI 161 .