Re: Final SRFI 261: Portable SRFI Library Reference
jobol 12 Feb 2026 10:35 UTC
Le Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:37:35 +0100,
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Am Fr., 30. Jan. 2026 um 13:26 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal
> <xxxxxx@nonceword.org>:
> >
> > There is no problem with multiple SRFIs having the same name. Vide
> > the several SRFIs called ‘records’ (9, 57, 99, 131 – according to
> > the SRFI metadata, that is)
>
> Why multiple SRFIs may have non-unique library name (parts), in this
> particular case the name "unifiable-boxes" is much better than "boxes"
> for for SRFI 161 .
yes and conversely, 'multiple-value-boxes' (SRFI 195) could really be
'boxes' because it "superseeds" SRFI 111.
