Is &syntax the correct condition type for disjointed variables?
Daphne Preston-Kendal 21 Oct 2025 13:27 UTC
Disjointed variables currently raise a &syntax violation when referenced. Is this the Right Thing? The thing is that these variables, when referenced, are arguably not being used incorrectly (which is the essence of &syntax), but rather that they can’t be used at all. At the same time, &undefined also feels wrong. Should I define a new condition type &disjointed, perhaps?
Daphne