Am Di., 3. Feb. 2026 um 23:45 Uhr schrieb Peter McGoron <xxxxxx@mcgoron.com>:
>
> 1. `do` would mess up automatic indentation for the text editor I use.
> It is dumb and only checks that the identifier is symbolically `do`.

How does your text editor deal with named let vs let?

> 2. Are there any other potential uses of the CFG syntax besides the
> planned loop macro?

Sure, whenever the simple lexical scoping rules of Scheme do not
reflect the semantics correctly. It is likely that further
applications besides the planned loop macro will also hide the
machinery behind more focused macros. State machines, parser
generators or general combinator libraries are potential applications.

Best,

Marc