Hi all,

The second published draft is very different of the first one.

It takes into account all remarks done on the list. Except that if
extension is made possible in the implementation, it is not written in
the SRFI because too much complicated at this time.

Thank you for your reviews.

José

Le Sun, 8 Mar 2026 09:20:12 -0700,
"Arthur A. Gleckler" <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> a écrit :

> I've just published draft #2 of SRFI 266
> <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-266/>. It was submitted by José Bollo,
> author of the SRFI.
>
> Here is the commit summary:
>
>    - Correct received date.
>    - new draft from Peter
>    - Add SPDX license metadata.
>    - copy edits
>    - Eliminate unnecessary redirects.
>    - Publish second draft.
>
> Here's the diff:
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-266/compare/draft-1..draft-2
>
> Regards,
>
> SRFI Editor