Re: New draft (#6) and last call for comments on SRFI 266: The expr syntax
Peter McGoron 02 Sep 2026 03:46 UTC
On 9/1/26 18:02, jobol wrote:
> What stopped me in fact is that Chez Scheme can't test that a library
> is available or not in cond-expand
> (https://github.com/cisco/ChezScheme/issues/91).
Looking at the standard operators, the only one that is not in the R6RS
is "unbox."
Guile ships SRFI 111, and chez-srfi[1] ships one that is a wrapper of
the Chez interface. So I think the sample implementation can import SRFI
111, with a note to remove it if the target implementation doesn't
support it.
> thank you for that and for your help
You're welcome!
[1]: https://github.com/arcfide/chez-srfi
-- Peter McGoron