Le Sun, 30 Aug 2026 19:40:42 -0400,
Peter McGoron <xxxxxx@mcgoron.com> a écrit :

> Some of these are grammar/spelling comments, and some of these are
> more stylistic.

Applied in next version, tahnkyou

> ___________________________________________
>
>  > The expression at its right is expressed using almost standard
>  > formulae.
>
> I'm not sure what this refers to. Is this the inside of (expr ...)?
>
>  > A previous SRFI, SRFI 105, Curly-infix-expressions, already
>  > introduced …
>
> I would omit "already" since "previous" is used here.
>
>  > The current SRFI …
>
> I would say "this current SRFI."
>
>  > According to SRFI 261…
>
> I would make more explicit that "expr" is the SRFI 97/SRFI 261 name
> for this library. It should also be added to the metadata so it shows
> up in the SRFI list.
>
>  > syntaxic
>
> Every instance of this should be replaced with "syntactic." This word
> means something different.[1]
>
>  > Operators are of one of the below types:
>
> Should omit "of" after "are of".
>
>  > The lower the priority number is, the most prioritized the
>  > operator.
>
> "most" should be "more."
>
>  > the predefined operators + and * have respective priority numbers
>  > of
> 50 and 40
>
> I would say "the predefined operators + and * have priority numbers
> of 50 and 40 respectively."
>
>  > Calls are made of two parts: the called and the arguments
>
> I would prefer "callee" because that is a noun, while "the called" is
> harder to parse. I would also mark-up "called" and "arguments" (or
> "callee" and "arguments") in italics to make it easier to read.
>
>  > evaluating to a callable lambda
>
> Technically, not all callable objects are lambdas, and all lambdas
> are callable. I would write "evaluating to a procedure."
>
>  > depending one the context
>
> Should be "depending on."
>
>  > Types of operators that can be defined are:
>
> Should be "The types of operators that can be defined are…" (no colon)
>
>  > OPERATOR X becomes (OPERATION X).
>
> I think you should add something like "each operator is associated
> with an operation, which is a procedure [add more explanation here]."
>
>  > When argument of a call, …
>
> This should have a subject, like "When the subexpression is the
> argument of a call, …"
>
>  >  it expands to the inner subexpression, literally.
>
> I would remove the comma before "literally."
>
>  >  Then ((a ...)) becomes …
>
> "Then" is a bit awkward here, because "((a ...))" was not introduced
> beforehand. I would write "in other words."
>
>  > in the below table:
>
> I would write "table below:"
>
>  > using internals of implementations
>
> I would write "using the internals of implementations."
>
> [1]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/syntaxic
>