Missing "tag" in EBNF? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Apr 2026 16:19 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? John Cowan (11 Apr 2026 18:45 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Apr 2026 19:00 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? John Cowan (11 Apr 2026 19:47 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? Peter McGoron (11 Apr 2026 19:52 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Apr 2026 19:52 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Apr 2026 20:02 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? John Cowan (11 Apr 2026 20:30 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (11 Apr 2026 21:45 UTC)
Re: Missing "tag" in EBNF? John Cowan (11 Apr 2026 23:06 UTC)

Missing "tag" in EBNF? Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 11 Apr 2026 16:18 UTC

Hi all,

I'm struggling to understand the "tag" syntax of this SRFI.  The
informal discussion of reader syntax says that "#a or #A [is]
immediately followed by a tag that specifies the type of the
elements of the array."  Yet the EBNF grammar has

    array-literal ::= "#a" bounds datum

and includes no production for a tag component.  Is this an oversight,
or have I misunderstood?

Wolfgang

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>