Re: SRFI 284: define-typed Artyom Bologov 27 Sep 2026 19:57 UTC

Hi Arne, hi Arthur,

> Is there a standard for optional extensions of SRFI’s?

Maybe add a separate library? That’s the only thing I can think
of. Except for a separate SRFI, of course.

Thanks,
--
Artyom Bologov
https://aartaka.me