SRFI 31 procedure vs. named-lambda Al Petrofsky 25 May 2002 06:11 UTC

Your procedure proposal appears to be the same as the r2rs
named-lambda special form, except you moved the name into the paramter
list.  If you want to revive named-lambda, I suggest you use the old
name and syntax, or else provide justification for the change.  I also
suggest you research why named-lambda was dropped from the reports (I
don't really know), and let us know why you think those reasons should
not deter you from this srfi.

-al