Re: Param ordering; < and <= felix (22 Jul 2002 18:45 UTC)
Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) (22 Jul 2002 20:06 UTC)
Re: Almost OT, < and <= David Feuer (22 Jul 2002 22:21 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) (23 Jul 2002 09:25 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= David Feuer (23 Jul 2002 14:28 UTC)
Re: Almost OT, < and <= felix (23 Jul 2002 07:30 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (in the field) (23 Jul 2002 08:27 UTC)
Re: Almost OT, < and <= Marc Feeley (25 Jul 2002 23:43 UTC)
RE: Almost OT, < and <= Ben Goetter (26 Jul 2002 02:47 UTC)

Re: Param ordering; < and <= felix 22 Jul 2002 18:26 UTC

>> Do you really think this makes a measurable difference in execution
>speed?
>
>In my example?  No.  As far as I know, both assembly versions will
>execute in the same number of cycles.  The difference between op< and
>op<=, while real, lies below the instruction level.
>

Where exactly? I can't find it... ;-)

cheers,
felix